Rabu, 01 Juli 2015

THEORIES POLITIC

Socrates (in Ramlan Surbakti, 2007: 25) defines democracy as a regime led by the people who rely solely on the desire of freedom or unnecessary (unnecessary desire). Socrates in this case has been considered that the concept of democracy is the rule that contains the policy on the basis of freedom and desire that is not important.

Plato (in F. Isjwara, SH, 1992: 185) classifies about the form of government are as follows: the best form of government is a monarchy and form slump (degenerate form) of the monarchy is tyranny. Monarchy is the ideal shape and tyranny is a form of decline, with the form of declining aristocracy and oligarchy and democracy in the form of declining then mobokrasi.

Aristotle classify forms of government in the three forms of government are good and three bad forms of government. Three forms of government or a good constitution is a monarchy, aristocracy and polity. In addition, there are three forms of bad government which is the deterioration forms of the good government, namely tyranny degenerate form of monarchy; oligarchs degenerate form of aristocracy and democracy as a form slump of polity, Aristotle (in F. Isjwara, SH, 1992: 187).

Sovereign people, to carry out the deliberations or voting strongly considering regional conditions and the condition of the people themselves. On the basis of these considerations, the implementation of the deliberations can be divided into two ways: first, directly, or all the people who had assembled; second, by not directly or through representatives.

Folk consisting of various backgrounds and interests of thought, in making a needed public policy procedures and mechanisms in accordance with the culture of the people who will take the decision. Principle in making public policy in general can be distinguished as follows: first, the principle of consensus; second, the principle of majority voting; Third, the principle of using both these principles by promoting one of the principles that exist between these two principles.

Henry B. Mayo (in Miriam Budiardjo, 2008: 117) explains that the democratic political system is to show the general policy is determined on the basis of a majority vote by the representatives of the people are supervised by the people in periodic elections based on the principle of political equality and implemented in ensuring an atmosphere of political freedom. The concept of democracy is a political system in which sovereignty is in the hands of the people and carried out entirely by representatives of the people.

Substantially, democracy means rule of the people, power and authority in the hands of all the people, not in the hands of God with his deputy, nor in the hands of a person, nor in the hands of a group of people. In this case every public policy must come from the voice of the people.

Therefore, in a democratic system, people got an important position because the people hold sovereignty. Abraham Lincoln give a sense of democratic government of the people by the people and for the people "government of the people, by the people, and for the people". Every country that adopts democracy will give great freedom and power to the people (Sahid Gatara, 2009: 251).

Jean Jacques Rousseau (in Ramlan Surbakti, 1992: 29) explains that no one is allowed to represent a person in making legislation that is fundamental. Folk can delegate the implementation of regulations concerning to state officials, but people can not delegate the authority to make the rules as if they delegate The real they become slaves.

Gaffar (2005: 3) explains that In political science, there are two kinds of understanding of democracy, namely understanding normatively and empirically understanding (procedural democracy). In a normative understanding that democracy is something that is going to be done or Idil organized by a state. The normative phrase usually translated in the constitution of each country. But things are not necessarily normative can be seen in the context of day-to-day political life of a country. Therefore, it is necessary to see how the meaning of democracy empirically, namely democracy in perwujutannya in practical political life.

The understanding of democracy in the context of this kind allows us to observe whether in a political system of government provides sufficient space for the citizens of the community to perform in order to focus praferensi political participation through the existing political organizations? Thus the meaning and practice of democracy can be different from each other.

            J. Schmandt (2005: 226) explain the meaning of democracy by providing an assessment of the St. Thomas who put political authority in society as a whole and see the authorities as representatives of the people to exercise the power of the people is real. No power in the hands of the people and carried out entirely by representatives of the people who were in the House of Representatives, in the hands of the people's sovereignty and oversight by the people directly. In carrying out its functions as a watchdog of government, the people form a community of social institutions.

0 komentar:

Posting Komentar